Expert network
Automated rules catch what can be measured. These reviewers catch the rest — accuracy, taste, accessibility, compliance — and put their name on the verdict.
Evidence somebody else can re-check.
Editorial director for regulated and technical copy
Fourteen years editing for financial and healthcare publishers. Works on claim substantiation, tone of voice and the difference between confident and overstated.
Compliance reviewer for claims, privacy and disclosure
Fifteen years in regulatory affairs across the EU and UK. Reviews marketing and product copy for claim substantiation, data disclosure and AI transparency obligations.
Application security reviewer for AI-generated backends
Eleven years in product security, most of it reviewing code that other people were in a hurry to ship. Specialises in authentication flows, secrets handling and the failure modes assistants introduce.
Media integrity and provenance reviewer
Former picture editor at a news agency. Verifies provenance, checks for manipulation and advises on disclosure practice for generative imagery.
Video and audio reviewer for generated media
Post-production supervisor turned reviewer. Looks at continuity, sync, lip-flap, caption accuracy and the artefacts that make a generated clip unusable at broadcast.
Front-end engineer and accessibility auditor
Builds and audits interfaces for public sector clients where WCAG conformance is contractual. Reviews markup, keyboard paths and screen-reader behaviour frame by frame.
Data quality engineer for spreadsheets and pipelines
Ten years cleaning data that arrived without a schema. Reviews column integrity, join assumptions and any figure that ends up in a board deck.
Documentation lead and information architect
Restructures documentation sets that grew a section at a time. Checks outline integrity, cross-references, version drift and whether a document can be followed by someone new.
Representative profiles · final availability confirmed on request
Apply to reviewChoose the skill the work actually needs, not the format it's in.
The automated findings travel with the request so the reviewer starts informed.
Findings, changes made and a verdict you can attach to the deliverable.
You are hiring the reviewer directly at their published rate. We take no commission on their time and no cut of the work — the fee for the platform covers the automated checks and the record of the review, not the person.
Reviewers wanted
Describe the work, the discipline and the deadline. If you have an automated report, attach it and the reviewer starts from the findings instead of from scratch.
